H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Dieblin vs Sigel H2H: 1-0

Dieblin holds a 1–0 lead over Sigel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dieblin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dieblin won the 1980 Unterhaching round of 32 6-0 3-6 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dieblin 6-0 3-6 6-2 Sigel Match data Jul 22, 1980* R32 Unterhaching WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dieblin 1,536 2 1 66.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sigel 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Dieblin Sigel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 2–1 66.7% 1,527 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Dieblin Sigel
Yr Clay Yr Clay
W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 2 1 3 66.7% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 2 1 3 66.7% Career 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Dieblin Sigel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1528 106.5 +23 57.1% +1.00 1–0 +0.03 1980 1484 97.4 33.3% -2.33 0–1 +0.10
Career 1536 103.7 +23 57.1% +1.00 1–0 +1.00 Career 1500 98.6 33.3% -2.33 0–1 +10.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.