H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Dinara Safina vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 3-4

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–3 lead over Dinara Safina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2009 Wimbledon fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dinara Safina
RUS Age 40 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Dinara Safina #1 4-6 6-3 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #17 Match data
Oct 10, 2008* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Hard Dinara Safina #3 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #25 Match data
Feb 17, 2007* Antwerp WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-1 6-3 Dinara Safina #11 Match data
Sep 7, 2006* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-2 6-3 Dinara Safina #13 Match data
Feb 11, 2006* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-2 6-2 Dinara Safina #17 Match data
Feb 13, 2005* Paris WTA 500 F Carpet Dinara Safina #48 6-4 2-6 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data
Jan 20, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 2-6 6-1 6-0 Dinara Safina #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dinara Safina #452 #1 10,521 2,120 299 160 65.1% 0 5 0 2 4 11
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dinara Safina Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 2002 12–5 70.6% #68 1,667 0 1 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2003 18–15 54.5% #54 1,749 0 2 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2004 20–19 51.3% #44 1,713 0 2 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2005 37–19 66.1% #20 1,839 0 4 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2006 44–21 67.7% #11 1,871 0 4 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2007 38–22 63.3% #15 1,862 0 4 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2008 51–18 73.9% #3 2,020 0 8 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2009 55–16 77.5% #2 1,951 0 11 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2010 13–16 44.8% #63 1,795 0 11 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2011 11–9 55.0% #132 1,783 0 11 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 — — — — — — — 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 — — — — — — — 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 — — — — — — — 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 — — — — — — — 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25