H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Dinara Safina vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 1-1
Dinara Safina and Kveta Peschke are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dinara Safina leads 1–0 on clay, while Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2006 Luxembourg quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2006* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Kveta Peschke | 6-4 6-3 | Dinara Safina | Match data |
| May 11, 2006* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Dinara Safina | 6-3 6-1 | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dinara Safina | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |