H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dinara Safina vs Laura Pous-Tio H2H: 2-0
Dinara Safina holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Pous-Tio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dinara Safina leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2006 Rome second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2006* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Dinara Safina | 6-4 6-2 | Laura Pous-Tio | Match data |
| May 14, 2005* | Prague | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Dinara Safina | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Laura Pous-Tio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Laura Pous-Tio | #776 | #72 | 930 | 1,621 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dinara Safina | Laura Pous-Tio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #75 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |