H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dinara Safina vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 2-5

Nadia Petrova holds a 5–2 lead over Dinara Safina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2010 Montreal third round 7-5 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dinara Safina
RUS Age 40 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 19, 2010* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Dinara Safina #70 7-5 4-6 6-4 Nadia Petrova #21 Match data
Sep 20, 2008* Tokyo WTA 1000 SF Hard Dinara Safina #5 6-1 6-0 Nadia Petrova #20 Match data
Apr 7, 2007* Amelia Island WTA 500 QF Clay Nadia Petrova #7 6-4 7-5 Dinara Safina #13 Match data
Mar 23, 2007* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #7 3-6 6-2 6-4 Dinara Safina #14 Match data
Feb 10, 2007* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Nadia Petrova #7 6-3 6-2 Dinara Safina #12 Match data
May 13, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 QF Clay Nadia Petrova #4 3-6 6-4 6-3 Dinara Safina #19 Match data
Jan 10, 2004* Gold Coast WTA 250 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #12 6-1 6-4 Dinara Safina #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dinara Safina #452 #1 10,521 2,120 299 160 65.1% 0 5 0 2 4 11
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dinara Safina Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 12–5 70.6% #68 1,667 0 1 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2003 18–15 54.5% #54 1,749 0 2 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2004 20–19 51.3% #44 1,713 0 2 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2005 37–19 66.1% #20 1,839 0 4 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2006 44–21 67.7% #11 1,871 0 4 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2007 38–22 63.3% #15 1,862 0 4 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2008 51–18 73.9% #3 2,020 0 8 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2009 55–16 77.5% #2 1,951 0 11 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2010 13–16 44.8% #63 1,795 0 11 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2011 11–9 55.0% #132 1,783 0 11 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 — — — — — — — 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 — — — — — — — 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 — — — — — — — 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13