H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dinara Safina vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 4-2

Dinara Safina holds a 4–2 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Dinara Safina leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2009 Rome third round 7-6(1) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dinara Safina
RUS Age 40 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 7, 2009* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Dinara Safina #1 7-6(1) 6-1 Virginie Razzano #35 Match data
Feb 19, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #58 6-4 6-2 Dinara Safina #2 Match data
Sep 5, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Dinara Safina #13 6-0 7-5 Virginie Razzano #112 Match data
Feb 16, 2006* Antwerp WTA 500 R32 Hard Dinara Safina #20 6-4 4-6 6-3 Virginie Razzano #42 Match data
Feb 10, 2006* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Dinara Safina #17 6-4 6-3 Virginie Razzano #40 Match data
May 25, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Virginie Razzano #39 6-3 6-3 Dinara Safina #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dinara Safina #452 #1 10,521 2,120 299 160 65.1% 0 5 0 2 4 11
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dinara Safina Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 12–5 70.6% #68 1,667 0 1 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 2003 18–15 54.5% #54 1,749 0 2 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2004 20–19 51.3% #44 1,713 0 2 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2005 37–19 66.1% #20 1,839 0 4 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2006 44–21 67.7% #11 1,871 0 4 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2007 38–22 63.3% #15 1,862 0 4 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2008 51–18 73.9% #3 2,020 0 8 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2009 55–16 77.5% #2 1,951 0 11 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2010 13–16 44.8% #63 1,795 0 11 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2011 11–9 55.0% #132 1,783 0 11 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2