H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dominika Cibulkova vs Alicia Molik H2H: 1-0
Dominika Cibulkova holds a 1–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominika Cibulkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2007 Guangzhou quarterfinal 6-7(7) 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2007* | Guangzhou | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-7(7) 6-1 6-4 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominika Cibulkova | Alicia Molik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |