H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Dominika Cibulkova vs Dinara Safina H2H: 0-3
Dinara Safina holds a 3–0 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dinara Safina leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2009 Roland Garros semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Dinara Safina | 6-3 6-3 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2008* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Dinara Safina | 6-3 6-4 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2008* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Dinara Safina | 6-2 6-1 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominika Cibulkova | Dinara Safina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |