H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dominika Cibulkova vs Elena Dementieva H2H: 1-3
Elena Dementieva holds a 3–1 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2009 Charleston quarterfinal 6-4 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2009* | Charleston | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Elena Dementieva | 6-4 1-0 (ret.) | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| Jan 27, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-2 6-2 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2008* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-4 6-2 | Elena Dementieva | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2008* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-0 6-7(1) 6-4 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominika Cibulkova | Elena Dementieva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |