H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dominika Cibulkova vs Evgeniya Rodina H2H: 2-0
Dominika Cibulkova holds a 2–0 lead over Evgeniya Rodina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2016 US Open second round 6-7(5) 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-2 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2016* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-3 6-0 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominika Cibulkova | Evgeniya Rodina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |