H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 1-6

Flavia Pennetta holds a 6–1 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Flavia Pennetta leads 6–0 on hard courts, while Dominika Cibulkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2015 Cincinnati second round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Flavia Pennetta
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 19, 2015* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Flavia Pennetta #26 7-5 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #59 Match data
Feb 15, 2012* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Flavia Pennetta #23 6-3 2-6 7-5 Dominika Cibulkova #17 Match data
Oct 7, 2011* Beijing WTA 1000 R16 Hard Flavia Pennetta #26 6-1 4-6 6-4 Dominika Cibulkova #22 Match data
Jan 9, 2010* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Flavia Pennetta #12 6-1 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #28 Match data
Oct 24, 2008* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Flavia Pennetta #14 6-3 6-1 Dominika Cibulkova #20 Match data
Jan 16, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Flavia Pennetta #37 6-4 5-7 6-4 Dominika Cibulkova #48 Match data
Jul 26, 2007* Bad Gastein WTA 500 R32 Clay Dominika Cibulkova #77 7-5 4-6 6-1 Flavia Pennetta #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8
Flavia Pennetta #15 #6 3,621 1,982 418 272 60.6% 1 1 0 6 3 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Flavia Pennetta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0 2002 1–3 25.0% #95 1,482 0 0
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0 2003 18–20 47.4% #69 1,559 0 0
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1 2004 30–22 57.7% #38 1,670 0 1
23 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2 2005 37–21 63.8% #23 1,777 0 3
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3 2006 29–18 61.7% #28 1,729 0 3
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4 2007 30–24 55.6% #39 1,768 0 4
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4 2008 50–23 68.5% #13 1,900 0 6
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8 2009 52–23 69.3% #12 1,902 0 8
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8 2010 45–23 66.2% #24 1,847 0 9
29 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8 2011 31–22 58.5% #20 1,785 0 9
30 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8 2012 19–13 59.4% #45 1,735 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 2013 19–20 48.7% #31 1,745 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2014 30–20 60.0% #12 1,780 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2015 27–20 57.4% #8 1,823 1 11