H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Francesca Schiavone H2H: 5-0

Dominika Cibulkova holds a 5–0 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2018 Rome second round 6-1 6-7(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2018* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Dominika Cibulkova #34 6-1 6-7(5) 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #271 Match data
Apr 9, 2016* Katowice WTA 250 QF Hard Dominika Cibulkova #53 7-5 6-1 Francesca Schiavone #101 Match data
Jan 15, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #24 6-3 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #42 Match data
Oct 6, 2011* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #22 6-2 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #9 Match data
Mar 26, 2008* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #38 3-6 6-4 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Francesca Schiavone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0
23 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1
29 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2
30 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4
31 — — — — — — — 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4
32 — — — — — — — 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5
33 — — — — — — — 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6
34 — — — — — — — 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 — — — — — — — 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 — — — — — — — 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 — — — — — — — 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 — — — — — — — 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8