H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 1-2

Jarmila Wolfe holds a 2–1 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jarmila Wolfe leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2015 Sydney International round of 16 1-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarmila Wolfe #68 1-6 6-3 6-4 Dominika Cibulkova #11 Match data Jan 16, 2015* R16 Sydney International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Dominika Cibulkova #27 6-4 4-6 7-6(8) Jarmila Wolfe #31 Match data Feb 24, 2011* R32 Qatar Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Jarmila Wolfe #31 7-6(5) 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #27 Match data Feb 16, 2011* R64 Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,964 368 265 58.1% 0 0 1 4 3 8
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0
19 2008 36–26 58.1% #19 1,843 0 0 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,735 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,894 0 1 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2012 34–26 56.7% #15 1,790 0 2 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,734 0 3 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,719 0 4 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,756 0 4 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2018 28–19 59.6% #25 1,872 0 8 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2
30 2019 2–9 18.2% #315 1,755 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Jarmila Wolfe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 27 18 45 60.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2010 18 18 36 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2011 29 15 44 65.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2012 19 17 36 52.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2013 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2014 29 17 46 63.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2015 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 37 17 54 68.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2017 22 15 37 59.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
29 2018 18 11 29 62.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 254 185 439 57.9% 72 53 125 57.6% 39 24 63 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 558/630 of Dominika Cibulkova's and 42/47 of Jarmila Wolfe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2007 23/34 0.3 3.9 62.2% 56.6% 46.2% 51.0% 47.4% 52.3% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 56/62 0.8 2.7 68.4% 60.8% 48.3% 54.4% 46.5% 56.7% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 36/37 0.6 3.3 67.4% 60.0% 49.3% 52.6% 53.6% 56.4% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 50/54 1.1 3.7 63.2% 60.8% 46.2% 53.9% 50.9% 55.6% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 53/62 1.1 4.2 56.1% 64.9% 46.5% 54.6% 53.9% 56.8% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 52/60 1.5 4.2 54.2% 66.3% 45.8% 50.4% 53.3% 56.4% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2013 45/50 0.9 4.8 60.8% 61.9% 44.4% 53.5% 44.6% 55.1% 45.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 51/55 0.8 4.3 66.5% 62.6% 45.5% 57.1% 50.5% 57.0% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 24/35 1.0 4.1 67.0% 61.0% 48.2% 53.0% 43.9% 56.6% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 67/74 1.0 3.2 66.4% 62.7% 47.5% 54.7% 50.3% 57.8% 48.0% 2014 15/16 5.6 3.9 58.1% 67.2% 45.9% 47.1% 47.4% 57.9% 40.9%
28 2017 46/48 0.8 2.9 66.1% 62.2% 48.0% 55.2% 49.2% 57.4% 45.5% 2015 25/29 4.2 3.7 59.2% 65.8% 47.6% 45.6% 40.9% 58.3% 38.4%
29 2018 45/48 1.1 3.9 65.2% 63.3% 48.4% 55.6% 48.6% 58.1% 44.3% 2016 2/2 6.0 5.5 58.3% 61.4% 31.9% 50.0% 29.2% 49.2% 37.1%
30 2019 10/11 0.9 4.5 66.1% 58.8% 45.1% 54.3% 40.4% 54.2% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 558/634 0.9 3.7 63.5% 62.2% 46.9% 54.0% 49.6% 56.5% 46.2% — 42/241 4.8 3.9 58.8% 66.1% 46.3% 46.4% 42.7% 57.7% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1532 109.1 — — — — — +33 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — -0.09
17 2006 1506 100.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 2–0 1–1 — +0.22 2004 1515 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08
18 2007 1606 123.4 -2.75 +1.36 0.957 49.0% -43 +45 — 48.7% +0.04 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 103.8 +0.03 2005 1538 107.7 — — — — -8 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.03
19 2008 1844 155.6 +2.09 +2.87 1.075 51.6% -8 -147 — 59.4% +0.56 10–9 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 108.8 -3.69 2006 1533 102.2 — — — — 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14
20 2009 1735 137.2 +0.81 +1.93 1.075 51.5% -29 +84 -128 59.0% +0.64 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 97.6 +0.20 2007 1475 97.8 — — — — -41 +56 — 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.59
21 2010 1754 142.7 +0.27 +0.68 0.989 49.8% -26 +62 -79 54.4% +0.28 9–8 (53%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 +0.39 2008 1505 117.9 — — — — -2 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.54
22 2011 1894 146.9 +1.53 +4.23 1.113 52.5% -32 -107 -88 61.0% +0.76 15–7 (68%) 9–5 (64%) 108.0 -1.26 2009 1563 119.3 — — — — -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65
23 2012 1791 146.5 +0.57 +4.09 1.101 52.3% -2 +69 -30 59.1% +0.78 6–11 (35%) 10–4 (71%) 97.7 +0.95 2010 1689 133.8 — — — — -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85
24 2013 1735 139.1 +0.40 +2.51 1.022 50.5% +15 +39 +28 51.7% +0.30 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 98.9 +0.89 2011 1698 138.0 — — — — -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13
25 2014 1719 152.6 +1.29 +4.23 1.109 52.3% +50 +17 +28 59.8% +0.75 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.4 -0.25 2012 1510 111.2 — — — — +23 +130 — 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36
26 2015 1757 143.5 -0.51 +1.77 0.989 49.9% +26 — -24 50.6% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–4 (60%) 105.0 -0.11 2013 1535 111.3 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 — — +0.26
27 2016 1952 148.1 +2.12 +4.65 1.136 52.9% -29 -154 -64 65.1% +0.91 19–10 (66%) 9–6 (60%) 108.8 -1.07 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 — — 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49
28 2017 1778 142.2 +1.03 +1.88 1.067 51.5% +59 -13 +40 55.3% +0.37 9–11 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 93.4 +2.63 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27
29 2018 1872 145.7 +1.54 +1.61 1.058 51.3% +3 -108 -24 58.3% +0.53 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 101.4 -0.82 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.07
30 2019 1755 115.9 -0.72 -0.79 0.839 46.7% +34 -72 — 29.6% -1.19 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1964 150.3 +0.95 +2.81 1.063 51.4% 0 -11 -38 57.0% +0.50 116–98 (54%) 83–60 (58%) 107.2 -0.41 — 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.