H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Kateryna Volodko H2H: 4-1

Dominika Cibulkova holds a 4–1 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2016 Eastbourne fourth round 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 39 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 2016* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Dominika Cibulkova #21 7-6(3) 6-3 Kateryna Volodko #65 Match data
Feb 12, 2015* Antwerp WTA 500 R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #18 6-1 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #195 Match data
Aug 26, 2011* Dallas WTA 250 R16 Hard Kateryna Volodko #68 6-3 6-1 Dominika Cibulkova #15 Match data
Sep 2, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #45 6-2 5-7 7-6(7) Kateryna Volodko #59 Match data
Jul 18, 2008* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #32 6-2 6-3 Kateryna Volodko #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,801 137 187 42.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Kateryna Volodko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,536 0 0
19 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,630 0 0
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0 2008 15–18 45.5% #62 1,646 0 1
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,769 0 1
23 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,665 0 1
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,719 0 1
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4 2012 7–11 38.9% #136 1,659 0 1
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,619 0 1
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,606 0 1
29 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1
30 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,653 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2018 3–11 21.4% #132 1,568 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,537 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,510 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,530 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,550 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,541 0 2