H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Kimiko Date H2H: 2-0

Dominika Cibulkova holds a 2–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2014 Brisbane round of 16 6-3 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominika Cibulkova #23 6-3 1-6 6-3 Kimiko Date #75 Match data Jan 3, 2014* R16 Brisbane WTA 500 Hard
Dominika Cibulkova #19 6-2 7-6(7) Kimiko Date #52 Match data Jul 28, 2011* R32 Stanford WTA 500 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,965 367 263 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2008 36–26 58.1% #19 1,844 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,735 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,894 0 1 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2
23 2012 34–26 56.7% #15 1,790 0 2 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,734 0 3 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,952 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,779 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,867 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,768 0 8 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2008 27 18 45 60.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2010 18 18 36 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2011 29 15 44 65.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2012 19 17 36 52.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2013 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2014 29 17 46 63.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2015 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 37 17 54 68.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 22 15 37 59.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 18 11 29 62.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 254 184 438 58.0% 72 53 125 57.6% 38 23 61 62.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
17 2006 1506 100.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 2–0 1–1 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1606 123.4 -2.75 +1.36 0.957 49.0% -43 +45 — 48.7% +0.04 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) +0.57 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06
19 2008 1844 155.6 +2.09 +2.87 1.075 51.6% -8 -146 — 59.4% +0.56 10–9 (53%) 8–3 (73%) -4.80 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20
20 2009 1735 137.2 +0.81 +1.93 1.075 51.5% -29 +84 -128 59.0% +0.64 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) -0.19 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17
21 2010 1754 142.7 +0.27 +0.68 0.989 49.8% -26 +62 -79 54.4% +0.28 9–8 (53%) 8–2 (80%) +0.59 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85
22 2011 1894 146.9 +1.53 +4.23 1.113 52.5% -32 -107 -88 61.0% +0.76 15–7 (68%) 9–5 (64%) -0.58 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50
23 2012 1791 146.5 +0.57 +4.09 1.101 52.3% -2 +69 -30 59.1% +0.78 6–11 (35%) 10–4 (71%) +0.30 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12
24 2013 1735 139.1 +0.40 +2.51 1.022 50.5% +15 +39 +28 51.7% +0.30 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) +0.96 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54
25 2014 1721 152.8 +1.29 +4.23 1.109 52.3% +48 +14 +24 59.8% +0.75 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) -0.59 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14
26 2015 1758 143.4 -0.51 +1.77 0.989 49.9% +25 — -25 50.6% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–4 (60%) -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 1953 148.2 +2.12 +4.65 1.136 52.9% -29 -156 -64 65.1% +0.91 19–10 (66%) 9–6 (60%) -1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1779 142.4 +0.87 +1.86 1.062 51.4% +59 -14 +40 55.3% +0.37 9–11 (45%) 5–5 (50%) +2.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1868 145.8 +1.50 +1.59 1.058 51.3% +7 -104 -27 58.7% +0.57 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1768 116.1 -0.36 -0.35 0.839 46.7% +46 -84 — 29.2% -1.25 1–3 (25%) 0–1 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16
Career — 1965 150.4 +0.94 +2.81 1.063 51.4% +1 -12 -39 57.1% +0.51 116–97 (54%) 83–60 (58%) -0.73 — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.