H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 2-4

Petra Kvitova holds a 4–2 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2016 Wuhan final 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 1, 2016* Wuhan WTA 1000 F Hard Petra Kvitova #16 6-1 6-1 Dominika Cibulkova #12 Match data
Mar 7, 2014* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #11 6-3 6-2 Petra Kvitova #9 Match data
Jan 10, 2013* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #15 6-1 6-1 Petra Kvitova #8 Match data
Oct 16, 2011* Linz WTA 500 F Hard Petra Kvitova #4 6-4 6-1 Dominika Cibulkova #23 Match data
May 7, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Petra Kvitova #18 3-6 6-3 7-5 Dominika Cibulkova #28 Match data
Jan 8, 2011* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Hard Petra Kvitova #34 6-0 6-4 Dominika Cibulkova #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9
23 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25
29 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27
30 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27
31 — — — — — — — 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29
33 — — — — — — — 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31
35 — — — — — — — 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31