H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Dominika Cibulkova vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-1

Dominika Cibulkova holds a 2–1 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2014 Miami fourth round 6-1 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 21, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #11 6-1 5-7 6-3 Venus Williams #31 Match data
May 29, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Venus Williams #2 6-3 6-4 Dominika Cibulkova #27 Match data
Feb 22, 2008* Doha WTA 1000 R16 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #45 6-3 6-3 Venus Williams #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominika Cibulkova Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47