H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Donna Faber vs Sabrina Goles H2H: 0-1

Sabrina Goles holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabrina Goles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabrina Goles won the 1988 Tampa round of 32 6-2 7-5.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
YUG Age 61 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sabrina Goles #61 6-2 7-5 Donna Faber #186 Match data Mar 31, 1988* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sabrina Goles #379 #27 25 1,843 114 119 48.9% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Faber Sabrina Goles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0 1983 2–4 33.3% 1,508 0 0
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0 1984 18–15 54.5% #55 1,700 0 0
20 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0 1985 21–20 51.2% #29 1,691 0 0
21 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0 1986 24–19 55.8% #30 1,780 0 0
22 1987 15–18 45.5% #64 1,711 0 1
23 1988 21–18 53.8% #59 1,715 0 1
24 1989 11–17 39.3% #105 1,624 0 1
25 1990 2–8 20.0% #205 1,548 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donna Faber Sabrina Goles
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
17 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 15 7 22 68.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 10 7 17 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 8 5 13 61.5% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1987 4 7 11 36.4% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1988 8 6 14 57.1% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
Career 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 35 37 72 48.6% 71 61 132 53.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 7 15 22 31.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donna Faber Sabrina Goles
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1496 103.9 33.3% -0.17 +0.11
16 1988 1532 112.2 +4 +14 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 +0.30
17 1989 1675 137.0 +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 1990 1631 115.4 -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) +0.90 1983 1509 109.0 +51 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +0.36
19 1991 1593 109.9 -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62 1984 1701 138.5 -131 +85 53.8% +0.38 6–8 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.72
20 1992 1542 119.9 +26 +37 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56 1985 1692 134.6 -8 +31 51.6% +0.16 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 -1.00
21 1993 1432 94.2 +34 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77 1986 1780 140.5 -48 +31 54.5% +0.39 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 100.8 -3.16
22 1987 1711 126.3 -39 +76 45.9% -0.46 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.1 -0.47
23 1988 1716 134.6 -30 +39 51.7% +0.18 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 99.8 -1.64
24 1989 1625 125.2 +45 +49 39.1% -0.50 5–5 (50%) 0–5 (0%) 95.0 -0.09
25 1990 1549 103.7 +46 19.0% -2.24 1–2 (33%) -0.04
Career 1719 121.4 +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33 1843 137.8 -34 +51 48.6% -0.04 35–40 (47%) 18–24 (43%) 93.6 -2.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.