H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Camila Giorgi H2H: 3-0
Donna Vekic holds a 3–0 lead over Camila Giorgi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Donna Vekic leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2021 Birmingham fourth round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2021* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Donna Vekic | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2018* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 6-0 7-5 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2013* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Donna Vekic | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Vekic | Camila Giorgi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |