H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Julia Glushko H2H: 0-1
Julia Glushko holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Glushko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Glushko won the 2014 Roland Garros first round 7-5 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Julia Glushko | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Julia Glushko | #1,394 | #79 | 721 | 1,546 | 13 | 32 | 28.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Vekic | Julia Glushko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #153 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #127 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #185 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #285 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |