H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 10:36 UTC

Donna Vekic vs Kimiko Date H2H: 1-0

Donna Vekic holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2014 Miami round of 128 7-6(2) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donna Vekic
Croatia Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Vekic #94 7-6(2) 6-2 Kimiko Date #93 Match data Mar 18, 2014* R128 Miami WTA 1000 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Donna Vekic #35 #17 2,458 1,933 238 235 50.3% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Vekic Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,551 0 1 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,562 0 1 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0
21 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,670 0 2 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2018 27–23 54.0% #34 1,764 0 2 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2
23 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,767 0 2 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,694 0 2 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5
25 2021 16–15 51.6% #68 1,759 0 3 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7
26 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,801 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,779 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 2024 31–20 60.8% #19 1,897 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,741 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2026 11–10 52.4% #35 1,780 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donna Vekic Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2012 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2015 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2017 9 16 25 36.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2019 24 18 42 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2021 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2022 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2023 15 12 27 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2025 9 13 22 40.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2026 1 5 6 16.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 145 159 304 47.7% 39 42 81 48.1% 54 34 88 61.4% — — — — — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donna Vekic Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
16 2012 1565 114.5 +2.21 -1.39 1.193 53.0% +23 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 1–0 +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 1604 122.4 +1.86 +0.10 1.090 51.8% -25 — +81 50.0% +0.17 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1551 121.9 -1.63 -1.74 0.922 48.4% +18 — +134 44.6% -0.50 5–9 (36%) 6–1 (86%) +0.34 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06
19 2015 1606 102.9 -2.51 -2.71 0.835 46.2% -22 -74 — 44.7% -0.74 6–1 (86%) — +0.48 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20
20 2016 1563 111.7 -2.41 -1.13 0.843 46.5% +44 -100 — 24.4% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) -0.70 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17
21 2017 1671 128.7 -0.06 -1.40 0.923 48.5% -43 -177 +56 45.8% -0.31 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) -0.52 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85
22 2018 1765 136.6 +0.36 +2.46 1.063 51.2% -66 -164 +16 55.0% +0.28 4–11 (27%) 5–6 (45%) -0.20 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50
23 2019 1768 149.9 +3.00 +2.48 1.137 52.4% -31 -59 +35 60.0% +0.92 8–11 (42%) 4–14 (22%) -0.01 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12
24 2020 1695 131.2 +0.33 0.00 0.985 49.4% +25 -42 — 40.5% -0.26 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) +0.19 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54
25 2021 1760 140.4 +1.94 +0.45 1.069 51.4% +15 — +80 52.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) +0.15 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14
26 2022 1802 135.3 +1.23 +0.20 0.999 50.4% +24 — +17 50.0% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2023 1779 141.0 +1.18 +0.52 1.024 50.6% +3 -121 +123 53.8% +0.22 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2024 1898 146.2 +3.22 +1.18 1.113 51.8% -96 -90 +119 57.0% +0.69 12–11 (52%) 6–10 (38%) -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2025 1742 135.8 -2.37 -0.97 0.874 47.3% +6 +20 +158 41.3% -0.52 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) +1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2026 1781 135.8 +1.57 -0.24 0.998 49.9% -68 +42 +151 52.1% +0.04 3–5 (38%) 4–2 (67%) -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16
Career — 1934 140.9 +0.86 +0.38 1.014 50.2% -17 -78 +87 50.4% +0.11 73–83 (47%) 57–75 (43%) +0.02 — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.