H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Donna Vekic vs Shuai Peng H2H: 1-0

Donna Vekic holds a 1–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2017 US Open second round 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donna Vekic
Croatia Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Vekic #52 6-0 6-2 Shuai Peng #24 Match data Aug 31, 2017* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donna Vekic #39 #17 2,458 1,933 243 239 50.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Vekic Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,552 0 1 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0
20 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,562 0 1 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0
21 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,670 0 2 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0
22 2018 31–24 56.4% #34 1,781 0 2 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0
23 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,770 0 2 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0
24 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,695 0 2 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0
25 2021 16–15 51.6% #68 1,760 0 3 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0
26 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,801 0 3 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0
27 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,778 0 4 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0
28 2024 31–20 60.8% #19 1,896 0 4 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0
29 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,741 0 4 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0
30 2026 12–13 48.0% #39 1,745 0 5 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donna Vekic Shuai Peng
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2012 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2015 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2017 9 16 25 36.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2018 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2019 24 18 42 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2021 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2022 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2023 15 12 27 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2025 9 13 22 40.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2026 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 149 162 311 47.9% 39 42 81 48.1% 55 35 90 61.1% — — — — — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 444/483 of Donna Vekic's and 451/553 of Shuai Peng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Donna Vekic Shuai Peng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2012 4/5 4.3 2.3 52.3% 70.6% 53.9% 25.0% 53.1% 62.9% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 24/24 2.7 2.8 56.0% 65.9% 50.9% 40.1% 46.9% 58.9% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 30/30 3.7 4.4 53.3% 66.6% 40.9% 47.3% 54.0% 54.4% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 14/20 3.9 5.6 57.9% 63.2% 43.0% 40.1% 45.4% 54.1% 38.4% 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0%
20 2016 20/20 2.9 6.3 49.8% 64.6% 39.8% 54.2% 52.4% 52.2% 40.3% 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0%
21 2017 36/37 4.0 5.3 56.0% 65.3% 45.8% 58.3% 47.7% 56.5% 40.6% 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5%
22 2018 49/55 3.1 4.7 55.1% 67.5% 44.7% 52.0% 48.1% 57.3% 45.4% 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4%
23 2019 59/59 3.6 4.3 57.1% 69.9% 47.5% 48.2% 52.0% 60.4% 45.0% 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5%
24 2020 19/19 2.9 4.4 58.0% 65.5% 43.7% 43.4% 45.6% 56.9% 42.5% 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3%
25 2021 28/31 4.6 5.5 57.2% 70.4% 45.8% 53.6% 44.5% 59.7% 43.1% 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7%
26 2022 25/25 3.8 5.3 56.6% 68.9% 45.0% 52.3% 57.0% 58.5% 41.5% 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4%
27 2023 46/47 4.0 5.4 56.0% 67.6% 44.2% 52.8% 51.8% 57.4% 43.6% 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7%
28 2024 44/51 4.8 4.8 57.2% 71.9% 45.2% 49.1% 46.5% 60.4% 44.1% 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3%
29 2025 22/35 3.0 5.8 53.4% 64.6% 39.6% 51.8% 43.1% 53.0% 41.1% 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2%
30 2026 24/25 3.9 4.5 58.0% 67.7% 45.2% 55.4% 38.1% 58.4% 40.9% 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9%
Career — 444/483 3.7 4.8 55.9% 67.7% 44.9% 50.2% 48.7% 57.6% 43.0% — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donna Vekic Shuai Peng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
16 2012 1565 114.5 +2.21 -1.39 1.193 53.0% +23 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 1–0 — +0.32 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02
17 2013 1604 122.4 +1.86 +0.10 1.090 51.8% -25 — +81 50.0% +0.17 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -0.09 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22
18 2014 1552 122.1 -1.63 -1.74 0.922 48.4% +17 — +134 44.6% -0.50 5–9 (36%) 6–1 (86%) 100.6 -0.23 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25
19 2015 1606 102.7 -2.51 -2.71 0.835 46.2% -21 -76 — 44.7% -0.74 6–1 (86%) — — +0.62 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12
20 2016 1563 111.8 -2.41 -1.13 0.843 46.5% +44 -99 — 24.4% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 -0.76 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81
21 2017 1670 128.8 +0.13 -1.26 0.933 48.8% -42 -177 +56 45.8% -0.31 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 94.6 -0.63 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16
22 2018 1782 137.0 +0.35 +2.36 1.063 51.2% -52 -181 -7 57.0% +0.37 4–11 (27%) 6–6 (50%) 92.6 +0.05 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57
23 2019 1771 150.5 +3.02 +2.45 1.137 52.4% -24 -62 +25 60.0% +0.92 8–11 (42%) 4–14 (22%) 89.1 +1.18 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70
24 2020 1696 131.1 +0.33 0.00 0.985 49.4% +28 -43 — 40.5% -0.26 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.62 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67
25 2021 1761 140.5 +1.94 +0.45 1.069 51.4% +17 — +73 52.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 97.9 -0.11 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38
26 2022 1802 135.2 +1.22 +0.17 0.999 50.4% +25 — +9 50.0% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -0.92 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22
27 2023 1779 141.0 +1.13 +0.49 1.024 50.6% +3 -119 +117 53.8% +0.22 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) 104.1 -0.44 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24
28 2024 1896 146.2 +3.22 +1.18 1.113 51.8% -95 -87 +112 57.0% +0.69 12–11 (52%) 6–10 (38%) 100.0 -0.31 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27
29 2025 1741 135.8 -2.37 -0.97 0.874 47.3% +6 +22 +152 41.3% -0.52 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 96.9 +1.04 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 2026 1745 136.4 +1.44 -0.81 0.983 49.6% -63 +83 +195 50.0% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.3 +0.22 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30
Career — 1933 141.1 +0.87 +0.34 1.014 50.3% -15 -75 +82 50.5% +0.11 74–86 (46%) 59–76 (44%) 94.2 +0.12 — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.