H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Donna Vekic vs Vania King

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Donna Vekic vs Vania King.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donna Vekic
Croatia Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Vekic #99 6-2 2-6 7-5 Vania King #77 Match data Jan 7, 2017 Q2 Q Sydney International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donna Vekic #36 #17 2,458 1,933 244 242 50.2% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Vania King — #50 1,225 1,767 128 161 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Vekic Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,552 0 1 2007 15–22 40.5% #109 1,629 0 1
19 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,520 0 1
20 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,562 0 1 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,592 0 1
21 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,670 0 2 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,598 0 1
22 2018 31–24 56.4% #34 1,781 0 2 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,692 0 1
23 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,770 0 2 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,618 0 1
24 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,695 0 2 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2021 16–15 51.6% #68 1,760 0 3 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,801 0 3 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,778 0 4 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2024 31–20 60.8% #19 1,896 0 4 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,743 0 4 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
30 2026 13–16 44.8% #36 1,727 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donna Vekic Vania King
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2012 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2013 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2014 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 11 15 26 42.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2015 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2017 9 16 25 36.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2018 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2019 24 18 42 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2021 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2022 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2023 15 12 27 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2025 9 13 22 40.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2026 3 11 14 21.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 150 165 315 47.6% 39 42 81 48.1% 55 35 90 61.1% — 96 110 206 46.6% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/487 of Donna Vekic's and 237/289 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Donna Vekic Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2012 4/5 4.3 2.3 52.3% 70.6% 53.9% 25.0% 53.1% 62.9% 44.2% 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 2013 24/24 2.7 2.8 56.0% 65.9% 50.9% 40.1% 46.9% 58.9% 44.8% 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 2014 30/30 3.7 4.4 53.3% 66.6% 40.9% 47.3% 54.0% 54.4% 42.1% 2007 21/37 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 2015 14/20 3.9 5.6 57.9% 63.2% 43.0% 40.1% 45.4% 54.1% 38.4% 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 2016 20/20 2.9 6.3 49.8% 64.6% 39.8% 54.2% 52.4% 52.2% 40.3% 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 2017 36/37 4.0 5.3 56.0% 65.3% 45.8% 58.3% 47.7% 56.5% 40.6% 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 2018 49/55 3.1 4.7 55.1% 67.5% 44.7% 52.0% 48.1% 57.3% 45.4% 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2019 59/59 3.6 4.3 57.1% 69.9% 47.5% 48.2% 52.0% 60.4% 45.0% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2020 19/19 2.9 4.4 58.0% 65.5% 43.7% 43.4% 45.6% 56.9% 42.5% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2021 28/31 4.6 5.5 57.2% 70.4% 45.8% 53.6% 44.5% 59.7% 43.1% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2022 25/25 3.8 5.3 56.6% 68.9% 45.0% 52.3% 57.0% 58.5% 41.5% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2023 46/47 4.0 5.4 56.0% 67.6% 44.2% 52.8% 51.8% 57.4% 43.6% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2024 44/51 4.8 4.8 57.2% 71.9% 45.2% 49.1% 46.5% 60.4% 44.1% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2025 22/35 3.0 5.8 53.4% 64.6% 39.6% 51.8% 43.1% 53.0% 41.1% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
30 2026 28/29 3.7 4.6 58.2% 66.2% 44.7% 55.2% 41.2% 57.3% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 448/487 3.7 4.8 55.9% 67.6% 44.8% 50.3% 48.8% 57.5% 43.0% — 237/289 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donna Vekic Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2012 1565 114.5 +2.21 -1.39 1.193 53.0% +23 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 1–0 — +0.32 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 2013 1604 122.4 +1.86 +0.10 1.090 51.8% -25 — +81 50.0% +0.17 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -0.09 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 2014 1552 122.1 -1.63 -1.74 0.922 48.4% +17 — +134 44.6% -0.50 5–9 (36%) 6–1 (86%) 100.6 -0.23 2007 1629 118.6 -1.36 -3.67 0.818 45.8% +20 -161 +14 42.0% -0.72 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 -1.51
19 2015 1606 102.7 -2.51 -2.71 0.835 46.2% -21 -76 — 44.7% -0.74 6–1 (86%) — — +0.62 2008 1521 117.8 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +52 -54 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.6 -1.10
20 2016 1563 111.8 -2.41 -1.13 0.843 46.5% +44 -99 — 24.4% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 -0.76 2009 1592 115.0 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +24 -123 -32 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +0.35
21 2017 1671 128.8 +0.13 -1.26 0.933 48.8% -43 -178 +56 45.8% -0.31 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 94.6 -0.64 2010 1599 118.2 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +26 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.40
22 2018 1782 137.0 +0.35 +2.36 1.063 51.2% -51 -181 -7 57.0% +0.37 4–11 (27%) 6–6 (50%) 92.6 +0.05 2011 1692 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -17 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2019 1771 150.5 +3.02 +2.45 1.137 52.4% -24 -62 +25 60.0% +0.92 8–11 (42%) 4–14 (22%) 89.1 +1.18 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -45 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2020 1696 131.1 +0.33 0.00 0.985 49.4% +28 -43 — 40.5% -0.26 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.62 2013 1632 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% 0 -44 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2021 1761 140.6 +1.94 +0.45 1.069 51.4% +17 — +73 52.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 97.9 -0.11 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +19 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2022 1802 135.2 +1.22 +0.17 0.999 50.4% +25 — +9 50.0% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -0.92 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2023 1779 141.0 +1.13 +0.49 1.024 50.6% +3 -119 +117 53.8% +0.22 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) 104.1 -0.44 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2024 1896 146.2 +3.22 +1.18 1.113 51.8% -94 -87 +112 57.0% +0.69 12–11 (52%) 6–10 (38%) 100.0 -0.31 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2025 1743 136.0 -2.37 -0.97 0.874 47.3% +5 +20 +153 41.3% -0.52 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 96.9 +0.97 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +8 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2026 1727 138.6 +0.71 -0.83 0.952 49.0% -59 +98 +214 47.1% -0.21 5–9 (36%) 5–4 (56%) 98.6 +0.12 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 141.2 +0.83 +0.33 1.012 50.2% -15 -74 +84 50.4% +0.10 75–87 (46%) 59–77 (43%) 94.1 +0.08 — 1768 128.1 -0.67 -0.73 0.935 48.6% +18 -80 -68 46.0% -0.32 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 103.9 -1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.