H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Donna Vekic vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-2

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2019 Cincinnati fourth round 2-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donna Vekic
CRO Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 2019* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Hard Venus Williams #65 2-6 6-3 6-3 Donna Vekic #26 Match data
Jun 29, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Venus Williams #8 7-6(3) 6-4 Donna Vekic #112 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Donna Vekic #35 #17 2,458 1,908 230 232 49.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Vekic Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,550 0 1 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,563 0 1 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,669 0 2 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2018 27–23 54.0% #34 1,761 0 2 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,767 0 2 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,693 0 2 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2021 14–14 50.0% #68 1,745 0 3 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,799 0 3 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,776 0 4 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2024 26–19 57.8% #19 1,862 0 4 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,734 0 4 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2026 10–9 52.6% #35 1,795 0 5 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47