H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Duk Hee Lee vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 0-2

Yvonne Vermaak holds a 2–0 lead over Duk Hee Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yvonne Vermaak leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1983 Lugano third round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Duk Hee Lee
Age 73
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Yvonne Vermaak
RSA Age 69 Right-Handed 155 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 12, 1983* Lugano WTA 250 R32 Clay Yvonne Vermaak 7-5 6-1 Duk Hee Lee Match data
Aug 12, 1982* Atlanta WTA 250 R32 Hard Yvonne Vermaak 6-4 1-6 6-2 Duk Hee Lee Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Duk Hee Lee — — — 1,749 57 82 41.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Yvonne Vermaak #558 #38 10 1,891 239 249 49.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Duk Hee Lee Yvonne Vermaak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1973 0–2 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,489 0 0
18 1972 0–4 0.0% — 1,473 0 0 1975 15–12 55.6% — 1,599 0 0
19 1973 3–5 37.5% — 1,489 0 0 1976 8–10 44.4% — 1,607 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1977 20–14 58.8% — 1,766 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 1978 29–23 55.8% — 1,797 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 1979 15–23 39.5% — 1,781 0 2
23 1977 1–0 100.0% — 1,506 0 1 1980 19–18 51.4% — 1,740 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1981 19–28 40.4% — 1,721 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1982 36–27 57.1% — 1,819 0 2
26 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,526 0 1 1983 33–26 55.9% — 1,754 0 4
27 1981 20–17 54.1% — 1,715 0 2 1984 29–28 50.9% #41 1,801 0 5
28 1982 14–22 38.9% — 1,704 0 2 1985 8–21 27.6% #41 1,605 0 5
29 1983 7–14 33.3% — 1,657 0 2 1986 6–11 35.3% #104 1,565 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #201 1,558 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #287 1,542 0 5