H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Edda Buding vs Fay Toyne H2H: 1-0

Edda Buding holds a 1–0 lead over Fay Toyne in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Edda Buding leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Edda Buding won the 1968 Roland Garros round of 32 4-6 6-1 7-5.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
AUS Age 82

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Edda Buding 4-6 6-1 7-5 Fay Toyne Match data Jun 2, 1968* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Edda Buding 1,694 33 27 55.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fay Toyne 1,721 73 66 52.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Edda Buding Fay Toyne
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
24 1968 36–16 69.2% 1,689 0 0
25 1969 20–15 57.1% 1,685 0 0
26 1970 13–14 48.1% 1,696 0 0
27 1971 2–12 14.3% 1,556 0 0
28 1972 2–6 25.0% 1,519 0 0
29 1973 0–2 0.0% 1,501 0 0
31 1975 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
32 1968 21–11 65.6% 1,623 0 0
33 1969 9–5 64.3% 1,675 0 0
35 1971 2–8 20.0% 1,618 0 0
36 1972 1–2 33.3% 1,628 0 0
38 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,614 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Edda Buding Fay Toyne
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
24 1968 1689 128.6 +55 -8 65.8% +1.23 8–3 (73%) -1.95
25 1969 1686 128.9 +66 -11 62.2% +1.22 0–6 (0%) +0.07
26 1970 1696 130.9 +47 -62 48.2% +0.13 1–1 -2.27
27 1971 1556 103.4 +44 +17 24.2% -1.88 1–4 (20%) +0.16
28 1972 1520 101.9 +91 -25 29.4% -1.41 0–1 +0.25
29 1973 1501 91.2 0.0% -5.00 +0.33
31 1975 1484 95.4 0.0% -3.50 +0.25
32 1968 1623 121.5 +67 -2 -55 63.4% +1.03 4–3 (57%) +0.55
33 1969 1675 120.8 +20 61.8% +0.53 3–3 (50%) -0.21
35 1971 1618 106.8 +32 -74 26.3% -1.95 0–1 0–2 -0.73
36 1972 1629 108.2 28.6% -1.14 1–0 -0.52
38 1974 1615 100.2 0.0% -3.50 +0.04
Career 1695 120.7 +67 +10 -65 54.9% +0.29 8–7 (53%) 0–2 -1.47 1722 126.6 +57 -15 53.9% +0.44 10–15 (40%) -2.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.