H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Edda Buding vs Frances Maclennan H2H: 1-2

Frances Maclennan holds a 2–1 lead over Edda Buding in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Frances Maclennan leads 2–0 on clay, while Edda Buding leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Frances Maclennan won the 1968 Madrid Open semifinal 2-6 6-3 6-2.

H2H
1 2
3 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frances Maclennan 2-6 6-3 6-2 Edda Buding Match data Apr 20, 1968* SF Madrid Open WTA 1000 Clay
Edda Buding 6-3 2-6 6-1 Frances Maclennan Match data Mar 3, 1968* F Munich Indoors WTA 250 Carpet
Frances Maclennan 6-2 6-3 Edda Buding Match data Jan 3, 1968* F Valencia WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Edda Buding 1,694 33 27 55.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Frances Maclennan 1,559 23 51 31.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Edda Buding Frances Maclennan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
24 1968 17–26 39.5% 1,466 0 0
25 1969 4–13 23.5% 1,442 0 0
26 1970 0–2 0.0% 1,417 0 0
27 1971 2–4 33.3% 1,441 0 0
29 1973 0–5 0.0% 1,416 0 0
31 1975 0–1 0.0% 1,406 0 0
32 1968 21–11 65.6% 1,623 0 0
33 1969 9–5 64.3% 1,675 0 0
35 1971 2–8 20.0% 1,618 0 0
36 1972 1–2 33.3% 1,628 0 0
38 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,614 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Edda Buding Frances Maclennan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
24 1968 1467 99.2 -56 +48 +50 40.6% -0.74 7–5 (58%) -0.16
25 1969 1442 88.4 +32 +17 22.6% -2.68 0–1 -0.71
26 1970 1418 95.1 0.0% -3.50 +0.32
27 1971 1441 108.4 +44 33.3% -1.25 -0.30
29 1973 1416 102.0 0.0% -3.13 +0.12
31 1975 1406 98.6 0.0% -3.00 +0.14
32 1968 1623 121.5 +67 -2 -55 63.4% +1.03 4–3 (57%) +0.55
33 1969 1675 120.8 +20 61.8% +0.53 3–3 (50%) -0.21
35 1971 1618 106.8 +32 -74 26.3% -1.95 0–1 0–2 -0.73
36 1972 1629 108.2 28.6% -1.14 1–0 -0.52
38 1974 1615 100.2 0.0% -3.50 +0.04
Career 1695 120.7 +67 +10 -65 54.9% +0.29 8–7 (53%) 0–2 -1.47 1559 97.3 -56 +43 +36 32.7% -1.40 7–6 (54%) -0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.