H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Emma Navarro H2H: 1-1
Ekaterina Alexandrova and Emma Navarro are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Alexandrova leads 1–0 on grass, while Emma Navarro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emma Navarro won the 2025 Adelaide fourth round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2025 | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Emma Navarro | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2023* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 6-4 6-3 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Emma Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |