H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Taylor Townsend H2H: 2-1
Ekaterina Alexandrova holds a 2–1 lead over Taylor Townsend in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Alexandrova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Taylor Townsend leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Taylor Townsend won the 2024 Charleston third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2024* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Taylor Townsend | 7-5 6-2 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2023* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Taylor Townsend | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2023* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Taylor Townsend | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Taylor Townsend | #80 | #46 | 1,267 | 1,859 | 68 | 85 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Taylor Townsend | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #365 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #309 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #135 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #94 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #81 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #89 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #117 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |