H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ekaterina Bychkova vs Aiko Nakamura H2H: 1-0
Ekaterina Bychkova holds a 1–0 lead over Aiko Nakamura in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Bychkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ekaterina Bychkova won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 6-3 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 42
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ekaterina Bychkova | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Aiko Nakamura | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Bychkova | #814 | #66 | 588 | 1,584 | 34 | 67 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aiko Nakamura | #730 | #47 | 569 | 1,645 | 50 | 76 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Bychkova | Aiko Nakamura | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #70 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #76 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #71 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #111 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #57 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #117 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #66 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #146 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #181 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #677 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |