H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ekaterina Bychkova vs Zuzana Ondraskova H2H: 1-1
Ekaterina Bychkova and Zuzana Ondraskova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Zuzana Ondraskova won the 2006 Portoroz third round 7-6(6) 6-6 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2006* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Zuzana Ondraskova | 7-6(6) 6-6 (ret.) | Ekaterina Bychkova | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2006* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ekaterina Bychkova | 6-1 6-4 | Zuzana Ondraskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Bychkova | #814 | #66 | 588 | 1,584 | 34 | 67 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zuzana Ondraskova | #1,140 | #74 | 811 | 1,595 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Bychkova | Zuzana Ondraskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #70 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #76 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #111 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #117 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #88 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #181 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #83 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #438 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |