H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Ekaterina Makarova vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 3-3

Ekaterina Makarova and Dominika Cibulkova are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2017 Rome third round 1-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 2017* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Ekaterina Makarova #43 1-6 6-1 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #5 Match data
Feb 22, 2017* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #37 6-2 4-6 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #5 Match data
Jan 22, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #34 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #6 Match data
Mar 6, 2014* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #11 6-4 7-5 Ekaterina Makarova #24 Match data
Jan 11, 2013* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #15 7-6(3) 1-6 7-6(1) Ekaterina Makarova #19 Match data
Oct 18, 2012* Moscow WTA 500 R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #14 2-6 6-4 6-2 Ekaterina Makarova #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,940 248 222 52.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Dominika Cibulkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0
19 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0
20 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0
21 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0
22 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,662 0 1 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1
23 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,604 0 1 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2
24 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3
25 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,838 0 1 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4
26 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,837 0 2 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4
27 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,784 0 2 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8
28 2016 23–18 56.1% #30 1,782 0 2 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8
29 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,836 0 3 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8
30 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,750 0 3 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8
31 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,700 0 3 — — — — — — —