H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ekaterina Makarova vs Francesca Schiavone H2H: 2-2

Ekaterina Makarova and Francesca Schiavone are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francesca Schiavone leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2014 Eastbourne Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ekaterina Makarova #22 7-5 6-3 Francesca Schiavone #77 Match data Jun 19, 2014* R32 Eastbourne Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Ekaterina Makarova #39 6-3 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #14 Match data May 16, 2012* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Francesca Schiavone #8 6-1 6-3 Ekaterina Makarova #41 Match data Aug 11, 2011* R32 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Francesca Schiavone #7 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 Ekaterina Makarova #66 Match data Aug 19, 2010* R32 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,942 252 225 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,965 445 370 54.6% 1 0 0 1 6 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Francesca Schiavone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0
20 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,576 0 0
21 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,656 0 0
22 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,663 0 1 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0
23 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,606 0 1 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0
24 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1 2004 35–23 60.3% #19 1,839 0 0
25 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,836 0 1 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,957 0 0
26 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,840 0 2 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,800 0 0
27 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,794 0 2 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,836 0 1
28 2016 27–21 56.2% #30 1,776 0 2 2008 24–22 52.2% #30 1,774 0 1
29 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,840 0 3 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,828 0 2
30 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,756 0 3 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,901 1 4
31 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,707 0 3 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,811 1 4
32 — — — — — — — 2012 21–22 48.8% #35 1,684 1 5
33 — — — — — — — 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,724 1 6
34 — — — — — — — 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,620 1 6
35 — — — — — — — 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 — — — — — — — 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,595 1 7
37 — — — — — — — 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 — — — — — — — 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Francesca Schiavone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2007 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2000 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2009 7 14 21 33.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 15 10 25 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2010 6 14 20 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2011 9 15 24 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 22 14 36 61.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2012 17 12 29 58.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2004 20 15 35 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
25 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 27 15 42 64.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
26 2014 30 15 45 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 20 15 35 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2015 18 9 27 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2017 21 14 35 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 10 7 17 58.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2018 12 13 25 48.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 22 15 37 59.5% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2019 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 7 13 20 35.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 16 26 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 8 8 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 165 149 314 52.5% 45 46 91 49.5% 42 28 70 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — 241 222 463 52.1% 147 91 238 61.8% 39 42 81 48.1% 18 15 33 54.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 442/477 of Ekaterina Makarova's and 516/714 of Francesca Schiavone's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Francesca Schiavone
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 4/4 2.3 2.5 66.4% 54.5% 37.8% 48.4% 66.9% 48.3% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 30/37 2.6 2.5 60.2% 62.5% 44.2% 40.5% 45.0% 55.1% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 39/41 2.2 4.0 58.6% 64.0% 40.9% 48.2% 50.2% 54.2% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 31/34 2.5 2.1 59.6% 59.5% 47.6% 57.5% 52.7% 54.8% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 36/38 2.5 2.4 60.5% 64.0% 43.2% 47.4% 47.1% 55.6% 39.4% 2003 10/55 2.4 3.0 50.8% 65.9% 49.0% 54.3% 53.1% 57.1% 45.1%
24 2012 45/45 2.1 2.0 62.9% 64.9% 50.6% 55.1% 49.3% 59.5% 43.6% 2004 8/58 3.3 2.4 48.7% 69.7% 46.9% 67.2% 65.9% 58.0% 42.7%
25 2013 41/42 2.9 2.1 64.4% 66.3% 47.4% 57.6% 50.6% 59.3% 45.1% 2005 13/60 3.8 3.3 54.1% 67.9% 48.8% 53.2% 47.0% 58.5% 42.8%
26 2014 56/60 2.6 2.1 64.0% 65.1% 47.7% 59.9% 44.7% 58.9% 45.0% 2006 42/58 2.9 4.0 53.0% 70.3% 49.7% 55.6% 46.2% 60.4% 46.4%
27 2015 36/42 2.1 1.8 66.0% 65.8% 54.1% 55.9% 53.9% 61.6% 43.2% 2007 45/49 2.5 5.0 52.4% 67.8% 45.9% 57.6% 45.9% 57.3% 43.2%
28 2016 40/48 2.5 2.8 65.6% 65.1% 47.3% 58.4% 53.6% 59.0% 42.4% 2008 38/46 2.2 3.9 52.0% 66.6% 46.0% 50.7% 47.9% 56.5% 43.4%
29 2017 47/48 2.9 2.9 65.5% 64.2% 45.5% 52.2% 45.3% 57.7% 43.3% 2009 55/60 2.5 3.9 54.7% 67.4% 47.5% 51.6% 50.5% 58.4% 45.2%
30 2018 34/35 2.4 4.1 64.4% 63.8% 43.6% 56.6% 44.0% 56.6% 41.5% 2010 54/59 1.9 3.5 57.5% 65.7% 49.4% 57.4% 50.9% 58.8% 46.4%
31 2019 3/3 3.3 3.0 67.3% 61.0% 43.4% 52.0% 36.3% 55.6% 38.7% 2011 51/55 2.8 4.8 54.2% 68.4% 46.3% 48.7% 44.7% 58.2% 43.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 39/43 2.4 5.5 51.1% 65.0% 47.0% 51.3% 42.6% 56.0% 41.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 47/49 2.4 5.9 53.6% 63.5% 44.8% 52.1% 51.5% 54.7% 43.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 36/39 3.1 3.6 55.5% 65.1% 47.8% 53.8% 48.8% 57.3% 42.5%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 22/26 2.1 4.2 55.3% 61.7% 49.2% 48.0% 45.8% 56.1% 42.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 26/27 1.8 5.2 52.7% 64.1% 42.5% 39.1% 50.0% 53.8% 45.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 25/25 2.0 4.3 56.5% 64.3% 46.8% 53.8% 46.2% 57.0% 42.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 5/5 2.2 7.0 53.1% 61.4% 44.1% 55.5% 29.7% 53.1% 37.5%
Career — 442/477 2.5 2.6 63.2% 64.2% 46.6% 54.0% 48.7% 57.6% 43.0% — 516/816 2.5 4.4 53.9% 66.2% 47.0% 52.6% 48.0% 57.3% 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Francesca Schiavone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1536 118.3 +1.82 -0.84 0.769 44.4% +21 — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 — — -0.12 1999 1495 105.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
20 2008 1626 124.1 -0.08 -0.65 0.958 48.7% -33 -52 +24 46.5% -0.34 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 102.4 -0.55 2000 1577 111.6 — — — — +27 -58 — 61.5% +0.77 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.07
21 2009 1634 131.6 -1.02 +0.38 0.960 49.1% -45 +48 +32 47.4% -0.49 7–8 (47%) 7–0 (100%) 107.5 -0.92 2001 1656 124.9 — — — — -51 +25 -48 52.3% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 101.6 +0.44
22 2010 1663 122.5 -0.26 -1.13 0.918 48.3% -104 -64 +173 45.5% -0.53 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 98.1 -2.59 2002 1692 130.7 — — — — -56 -1 -76 45.5% -0.20 10–5 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 104.9 +0.48
23 2011 1606 131.9 +0.66 -2.66 0.887 47.4% -47 +70 +141 40.9% -0.75 6–6 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 101.5 -1.38 2003 1804 145.2 +1.14 +1.01 1.051 51.1% +5 -111 -146 54.6% +0.26 10–3 (77%) 4–4 (50%) 107.0 -0.09
24 2012 1758 146.6 +3.45 +1.31 1.076 51.4% -30 -80 +28 57.1% +0.51 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 96.8 -2.49 2004 1840 144.5 +1.62 -0.20 1.017 50.9% -13 -40 -204 56.1% +0.32 12–4 (75%) 11–7 (61%) 107.4 +0.09
25 2013 1836 145.0 +3.78 +1.69 1.108 52.2% -22 -149 -40 59.3% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -1.08 2005 1958 157.0 +1.87 +0.33 1.031 50.8% +6 -125 — 61.4% +0.83 11–7 (61%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 -2.53
26 2014 1841 150.2 +3.13 +1.93 1.095 51.8% +1 -157 +25 60.2% +0.56 11–2 (85%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -1.18 2006 1800 149.9 +4.22 +2.51 1.172 53.2% -2 +102 -135 59.0% +1.00 8–6 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 99.5 +0.44
27 2015 1795 142.0 +3.14 +1.65 1.125 52.5% +49 -71 +5 64.8% +0.89 4–7 (36%) 5–1 (83%) 98.0 +1.69 2007 1836 133.7 +1.60 -0.02 1.013 50.4% -7 +41 -168 50.5% -0.15 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -0.91
28 2016 1776 140.5 +2.86 -0.13 1.035 50.8% +17 -78 +71 55.0% +0.41 8–9 (47%) 3–2 (60%) 96.7 +0.36 2008 1774 149.6 +1.76 +0.31 0.997 50.0% +15 +71 -153 53.4% +0.36 4–9 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 -2.68
29 2017 1841 148.6 +1.78 +0.54 1.022 50.2% +18 -103 -20 52.7% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.6 -2.16 2009 1829 141.0 +2.94 +1.36 1.088 51.6% -32 -4 -42 55.6% +0.59 8–6 (57%) 5–9 (36%) 99.4 -0.75
30 2018 1757 140.7 +0.52 -0.09 0.957 49.2% +11 -59 +62 45.8% -0.40 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 101.3 -2.54 2010 1901 156.3 +3.15 +2.63 1.128 52.6% -46 +83 — 62.5% +0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.28
31 2019 1707 109.2 -2.16 -1.63 0.871 47.4% +6 — — 25.0% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — 0.00 2011 1811 143.2 +2.98 +0.45 1.049 51.1% -43 +181 -71 58.3% +0.59 11–10 (52%) 6–8 (43%) 98.0 +2.37
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1685 125.9 +0.25 -1.18 0.947 49.0% -45 +232 +102 48.9% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 101.5 +0.43
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1724 139.3 0.00 -0.13 0.949 48.7% -23 +111 +43 49.1% -0.12 11–9 (55%) 11–9 (55%) 103.8 -3.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1621 131.4 +0.79 -0.71 0.996 50.0% -4 +144 +100 38.9% -0.30 5–9 (36%) 2–5 (29%) 93.1 -1.85
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1562 117.6 -1.24 -0.38 0.957 48.9% +24 +121 — 37.3% -0.73 3–4 (43%) 3–5 (38%) 97.9 -0.20
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1596 117.3 -1.53 +0.62 0.987 49.7% -20 +130 +36 53.6% +0.07 4–4 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 101.4 +0.46
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1619 116.3 +0.12 -0.86 0.980 49.6% -110 +194 -13 45.5% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 0–4 (0%) 95.5 +0.33
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1502 100.1 -2.95 -1.92 0.801 45.1% — +232 — 16.7% -2.58 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
Career — 1942 146.2 +1.78 +0.38 1.014 50.2% -11 -55 +51 52.5% +0.08 72–73 (50%) 49–43 (53%) 104.0 -2.73 — 1966 145.3 +1.57 +0.52 1.028 50.6% -17 +67 -42 52.9% +0.26 130–106 (55%) 88–91 (49%) 101.3 -0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.