H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ekaterina Makarova vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 2-4

Lucie Safarova holds a 4–2 lead over Ekaterina Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2018 Wimbledon third round 4-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 8, 2018* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Ekaterina Makarova #35 4-6 6-4 6-1 Lucie Safarova #66 Match data
Aug 11, 2017* Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lucie Safarova #41 6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 Ekaterina Makarova #42 Match data
Feb 27, 2015* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Lucie Safarova #15 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 Ekaterina Makarova #9 Match data
Jul 4, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Lucie Safarova #23 6-3 6-1 Ekaterina Makarova #22 Match data
May 8, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Ekaterina Makarova #24 6-2 7-5 Lucie Safarova #25 Match data
Oct 22, 2009* Moscow WTA 500 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #41 6-2 6-2 Ekaterina Makarova #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,940 248 222 52.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
21 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
22 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,662 0 1 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,604 0 1 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,838 0 1 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,837 0 2 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
27 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,784 0 2 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2016 23–18 56.1% #30 1,782 0 2 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,836 0 3 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,750 0 3 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,700 0 3 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7