H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ekaterina Makarova vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 2-2
Ekaterina Makarova and Marion Bartoli are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marion Bartoli leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2013 Madrid fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2013* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-3 6-2 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2011* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-0 6-2 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2010* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-2 6-0 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Makarova | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |