H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ekaterina Makarova vs Olga Savchuk H2H: 1-1
Ekaterina Makarova and Olga Savchuk are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Olga Savchuk leads 1–0 on clay, while Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2014 Pattaya third round 3-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 38
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2014* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Olga Savchuk | Match data |
| May 2, 2008* | Fes | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Olga Savchuk | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Olga Savchuk | #906 | #79 | 588 | 1,597 | 36 | 77 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Makarova | Olga Savchuk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #285 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #150 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #195 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #196 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |