H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Ekaterina Makarova vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-2

Venus Williams holds a 2–1 lead over Ekaterina Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2014 Australian Open first round 2-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 15, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #22 2-6 6-4 6-4 Venus Williams #37 Match data
May 17, 2012* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Venus Williams #63 7-6(7) 6-1 Ekaterina Makarova #39 Match data
Jun 24, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Venus Williams #2 6-0 6-4 Ekaterina Makarova #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,940 248 222 52.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,662 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,604 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,838 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,837 0 2 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,784 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2016 23–18 56.1% #30 1,782 0 2 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,836 0 3 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,750 0 3 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,700 0 3 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47