H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Baltacha vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 0-2
Stephanie Foretz Gacon holds a 2–0 lead over Elena Baltacha in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Foretz Gacon leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Foretz Gacon won the 2012 Strasbourg third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2012* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | 6-4 6-0 | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | 6-2 6-4 | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Baltacha | #225 | #49 | 1,179 | 1,664 | 47 | 74 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Baltacha | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #51 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #174 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |