H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Alina Jidkova H2H: 1-0
Elena Bovina holds a 1–0 lead over Alina Jidkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Bovina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2004 Linz quarterfinal 6-7(3) 6-2 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2004* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Elena Bovina | 6-7(3) 6-2 3-0 (ret.) | Alina Jidkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Alina Jidkova | #613 | #51 | 648 | 1,611 | 47 | 112 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Alina Jidkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #79 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #85 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #97 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #55 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 7–25 | 21.9% | #124 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #335 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,413 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,386 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,374 | 0 | 0 |