H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Elena Bovina vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 1-0

Elena Bovina holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Bovina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2003 Canadian Open round of 16 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Bovina
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elena Bovina #21 6-2 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #14 Match data Aug 15, 2003* R16 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elena Bovina #777 #14 1,758 1,967 127 110 53.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Bovina Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 2000 3–5 37.5% #133 1,500 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0
18 2001 16–19 45.7% #49 1,576 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 2002 29–19 60.4% #26 1,804 0 2 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0
20 2003 25–22 53.2% #21 1,831 0 2 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0
21 2004 37–18 67.3% #15 1,958 0 3 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2
22 2005 12–8 60.0% #61 1,915 0 3 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3
23 2006 0–2 0.0% #1431 1,869 0 3 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3
24 2007 1–6 14.3% #329 1,763 0 3 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3
25 2008 2–1 66.7% #186 1,761 0 3 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5
26 2009 1–2 33.3% #210 1,732 0 3 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6
27 2010 0–4 0.0% #162 1,656 0 3 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6
28 2011 1–4 20.0% #301 1,601 0 3 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elena Bovina Amanda Coetzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 2000 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 2001 7 13 20 35.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2003 20 14 34 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2004 23 9 32 71.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 2005 3 4 7 42.9% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
26 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2010 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 65 133 51.1% 32 22 54 59.3% 11 12 23 47.8% 16 11 27 59.3% — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elena Bovina Amanda Coetzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21
17 2000 1501 117.9 — — — — +56 — — 46.7% -0.13 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.64 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21
18 2001 1576 127.9 — — — — -26 +37 +43 43.2% -0.42 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) 104.3 -0.52 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00
19 2002 1804 141.0 — — — — -69 -120 -125 60.2% +0.59 9–13 (41%) 15–4 (79%) 109.1 +0.14 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77
20 2003 1831 146.3 +0.86 +0.06 0.914 47.8% +11 -204 -192 52.7% +0.35 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 -0.30 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99
21 2004 1958 154.4 +1.40 +1.73 1.094 52.5% +18 -254 -308 62.6% +0.99 9–6 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 105.7 -1.10 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59
22 2005 1916 135.0 +1.64 +3.12 1.215 54.3% -5 -119 — 57.1% +0.47 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 -0.03 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72
23 2006 1870 98.7 +0.28 -2.27 0.441 35.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.18 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38
24 2007 1763 112.8 -0.47 -0.97 0.774 45.1% +7 — — 14.3% -2.14 — 0–1 — -0.39 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
25 2008 1762 104.0 +0.40 -0.20 0.940 49.2% +1 — — 57.1% 0.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.01 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54
26 2009 1733 106.9 -0.83 +1.03 1.085 51.7% — — — 33.3% 0.00 — — — -0.22 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82
27 2010 1656 99.2 -3.01 -2.23 0.754 43.5% +5 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50
28 2011 1602 98.2 -3.89 -0.63 0.821 45.1% +18 — — 25.0% -1.75 1–1 — — -0.01 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28
33 2016 1581 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 144.5 -0.17 +0.44 0.938 48.7% -6 -134 -125 52.4% +0.22 41–39 (51%) 33–17 (66%) 109.0 -0.92 — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.