H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 1-2
Lisa Raymond holds a 2–1 lead over Elena Bovina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2002 New Haven third round 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2002* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Elena Bovina | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2002* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Lisa Raymond | 7-5 6-4 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-2 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Lisa Raymond | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |