H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 1-2
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–1 lead over Elena Bovina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2003 Australian Open third round 7-5 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Elena Bovina | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2002* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Magdalena Maleeva | 7-5 7-5 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Magdalena Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |