H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Maria Vento-Kabchi H2H: 1-0
Elena Bovina holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Bovina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2005 Roland Garros first round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Elena Bovina | 6-0 6-3 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Maria Vento-Kabchi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |