H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-1
Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Bovina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2000 Philadelphia fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2000* | Philadelphia | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-1 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |