H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Meilen Tu H2H: 0-1
Meilen Tu holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Bovina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2002 Antwerp third round 6-4 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2002* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Meilen Tu | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Meilen Tu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |