H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 3-0
Elena Bovina holds a 3–0 lead over Samantha Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elena Bovina leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2003 Indian Wells third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elena Bovina | 6-1 6-0 | Samantha Reeves | Match data |
| May 10, 2002* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Elena Bovina | 6-4 7-6(1) | Samantha Reeves | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Elena Bovina | 6-3 6-1 | Samantha Reeves | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Samantha Reeves | #864 | #62 | 523 | 1,629 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Samantha Reeves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #111 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #74 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |