H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Bovina vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 1-1
Elena Bovina and Silvia Farina Elia are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on clay, while Elena Bovina leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2004 Eastbourne third round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2004* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Elena Bovina | 7-5 6-0 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Elena Bovina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Bovina | Silvia Farina Elia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |