H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 5-11

Amélie Mauresmo holds an 11–5 lead over Elena Dementieva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, they are tied 4–4 on hard courts, while Amélie Mauresmo leads 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 Madrid Open third round 1-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Dementieva
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 11
16 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #21 1-6 6-4 6-2 Elena Dementieva #5 Match data May 14, 2009* R16 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #24 7-6(7) 2-6 6-4 Elena Dementieva #4 Match data Feb 15, 2009* F Paris Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Elena Dementieva #5 6-4 6-0 Amélie Mauresmo #24 Match data Oct 25, 2008* QF Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Elena Dementieva #15 6-2 7-5 Amélie Mauresmo #12 Match data Oct 4, 2007* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-2 6-3 Elena Dementieva #7 Match data Nov 7, 2005 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #4 7-5 2-6 7-5 Elena Dementieva #10 Match data Nov 6, 2005* F Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-3 6-4 Elena Dementieva #8 Match data Oct 8, 2005* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Elena Dementieva #6 4-6 6-4 7-6(1) Amélie Mauresmo #2 Match data Sep 9, 2004* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Elena Dementieva #10 6-4 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data Jun 3, 2004* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-3 6-2 Elena Dementieva #9 Match data Nov 5, 2003 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #7 6-4 6-1 Elena Dementieva #8 Match data Oct 4, 2003* SF Moscow Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Elena Dementieva #15 3-6 6-4 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #6 Match data Aug 16, 2003* QF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #7 6-0 6-0 Elena Dementieva #20 Match data Feb 8, 2003* SF Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Amélie Mauresmo #15 (w/o) Elena Dementieva #9 Match data Apr 14, 2001* QF Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #16 1-6 6-3 7-5 Elena Dementieva #144 Match data May 6, 1999* R32 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #34 6-7 7-6 6-1 Elena Dementieva #232 Match data Jul 9, 1998* R32 Prague Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,125 483 245 66.3% 0 1 3 0 7 5 16
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 0 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,583 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2000 38–20 65.5% #11 1,897 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,840 0 0 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,764 0 0 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2004 40–23 63.5% #6 1,975 0 4 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,916 0 4 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,922 0 6 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,969 0 8 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2008 56–17 76.7% #4 2,050 0 11 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,987 0 14 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,955 0 16 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 — — — — — — — 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elena Dementieva Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 1999 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2000 25 10 35 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2003 24 13 37 64.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2004 27 14 41 65.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2005 28 15 43 65.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2006 24 13 37 64.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2007 24 11 35 68.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2008 33 10 43 76.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2009 35 11 46 76.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
Career — 287 142 429 66.9% 103 55 158 65.2% 41 20 61 67.2% 52 28 80 65.0% — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 319/527 of Elena Dementieva's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Elena Dementieva Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 8/72 1.3 3.9 63.6% 65.3% 42.0% 57.8% 70.6% 56.9% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 13/63 0.8 9.8 57.2% 62.8% 38.5% 44.9% 55.2% 52.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 21/63 0.8 8.7 57.0% 62.1% 39.9% 50.1% 50.1% 52.2% 50.7% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2006 46/66 0.8 8.4 60.8% 61.8% 41.0% 50.6% 49.1% 53.7% 49.9% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2007 54/59 1.5 7.1 56.6% 64.7% 44.3% 48.3% 57.1% 55.7% 50.7% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2008 59/73 1.5 4.1 64.0% 63.4% 45.2% 57.6% 53.0% 56.9% 48.6% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2009 67/73 1.9 5.8 60.2% 67.3% 47.2% 57.5% 53.7% 59.5% 49.3% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2010 51/58 1.5 4.7 64.7% 63.3% 47.4% 56.6% 54.7% 57.9% 50.0% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
Career — 319/728 1.4 6.2 60.8% 64.1% 44.5% 53.8% 53.9% 56.5% 49.7% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elena Dementieva Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1493 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 1998 1479 106.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.13 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 1999 1584 124.5 — — — — -21 -3 — 54.0% +0.38 1–7 (13%) 0–1 — +1.54 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.06
18 2000 1897 159.0 — — — — -23 -186 — 59.6% +0.65 17–7 (71%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.08 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.59
19 2001 1841 149.4 — — — — +14 -69 -259 58.3% +0.58 8–10 (44%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.46 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.67
20 2002 1764 143.8 — — — — +7 -19 -9 60.1% +0.78 7–16 (30%) 9–12 (43%) — +3.61 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.71
21 2003 1967 156.8 +1.60 +2.78 1.106 52.3% -16 -140 -134 61.8% +0.81 15–12 (56%) 10–3 (77%) — -1.46 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) — -2.74
22 2004 1976 161.0 -0.64 +4.50 1.046 51.0% +8 -84 — 58.0% +0.42 14–4 (78%) 7–3 (70%) — -2.48 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.13
23 2005 1916 156.8 -1.41 +5.17 1.059 51.3% +26 -5 -155 59.7% +0.74 18–6 (75%) 8–3 (73%) — +2.18 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) — -2.28
24 2006 1922 155.6 -0.92 +5.86 1.077 51.8% +31 -42 -40 61.4% +0.70 18–3 (86%) 9–1 (90%) — +1.22 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.48
25 2007 1969 151.5 +0.08 +6.52 1.145 53.1% +12 +5 -105 66.4% +1.22 10–3 (77%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.18 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.83
26 2008 2051 160.2 +2.18 +5.30 1.128 52.8% -4 -41 -104 71.0% +1.43 17–8 (68%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.32 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) — -3.85
27 2009 1988 160.0 +3.77 +5.90 1.216 54.3% +41 -23 -33 71.7% +1.67 9–10 (47%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.09 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) — -1.04
28 2010 1956 165.7 +2.28 +6.35 1.189 54.0% +28 -23 — 65.6% +1.32 12–6 (67%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.18 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.52
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.60
Career — 2125 161.4 +1.36 +5.78 1.141 53.0% +11 -53 -91 62.8% +0.92 146–93 (61%) 82–64 (56%) 106.3 +0.35 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.