H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 2-1
Elena Dementieva holds a 2–1 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2006 Moscow semifinal 7-5 3-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2006* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | SF | Carpet | Anna Chakvetadze | 7-5 3-6 6-0 | Elena Dementieva | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-1 4-6 7-6(5) | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-2 6-1 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Anna Chakvetadze | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |