H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 4-0
Elena Dementieva holds a 4–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2009 Beijing second round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2009* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-4 6-0 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2009* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Elena Dementieva | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| May 19, 2006* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Elena Dementieva | 7-6(1) 3-6 6-1 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Sep 12, 2003* | Bali | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-4 6-1 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elena Dementieva | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |